Identification of users for advertising using data with missing values

ABSTRACT

A method and system for identifying users for advertising. Users, attributes, and first web sites provided by ISPs accessed by the users are identified. First data including content of the first web sites and user time spent thereon are received from ISPs and analyzed to determine first attribute values indicative of user interest. Second data received from ISPs include content of second web sites and user time spent thereon. Second attribute values, derived from questionnaires completed by the users, indicate interest in each attribute by each user. Third attribute values are determined by combining the first and second attribute values. The third attribute values are processed to identify users to which a product or service may be advertised. The identified users are communicated to a service provider or product provider. The first, second, or third attribute values may have missing values, which are determined by correlation and linear regression.

RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation application claiming priority to Ser. No. 11/936,832, filed Nov. 9, 2007, which is a continuation-in-part of copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/755,905, filed May 31, 2007.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Internet web sites display many different types of information to Internet users. Depending on the nature of the web site, users may be provided with news or sports headlines, weather updates, product information and pricing, opinions on general interest topics, and detailed discussions pertaining to special interest groups. Virtually every conceivable topic of interest has at least one web site dedicated to the topic. Furthermore, web sites more and more display numerous advertising banners and associated links.

Just as there is a variety of Internet users, there is a corresponding variety in sites on the Internet. People accessing the Internet vary widely in age, occupation, income, education, culture and interests. Advertising material promoted on a web site may be of little interest or relevance to the user. The result is that the user ignores the advertising or may even be sufficiently perturbed by its content to avoid future visits to the site. The content provided may even be offensive to certain people accessing a particular site.

Thus, there is a need for a method and system that overcomes at least one of the aforementioned disadvantages of the prior art.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides a method for identifying users for advertising purposes, said method comprising:

identifying N users and M attributes, wherein N≧4 and M≧2;

identifying a first network of first web sites of the Internet accessed by N users, said access to the first web sites provided to the N users by a first at least one Internet Service Provider (ISP);

receiving, from the first at least one ISP, first data comprising content of the first web sites and time data pertaining to when each user of the N users accessed the first web sites;

analyzing the first data, said analyzing comprising determining first attribute values comprising a first value of each attribute of the N attributes for each user, wherein the first value of each attribute is indicative of a level of interest in each attribute by each user, said analyzing based on an amount of time spent by each user at each website of the first web sites in relation to the content of each website of the first web sites, wherein V_(n,m,1) denotes the determined first attribute value for attribute m of user n for n=1, 2, . . . , N and m=1, 2, . . . , M;

identifying a second network of second web sites of the Internet accessed by the plurality users, said access to the second web sites provided to the N users by a second at least one ISP;

determining, from questionnaires completed by the N users, second attribute values comprising a second value of each attribute of the plurality of attributes for each user, wherein the second value is indicative of a level of interest in each attribute by each user, wherein attribute values of the second attribute values have been indicated on the questionnaire by the users of the N users for each attribute to which a keyword relevant to the second web sites has been mapped, and wherein the second data pertains to said access of the second web sites by the N users, and wherein V_(n,m,2) denotes the determined second attribute value for attribute m of user n for n=1, 2, . . . , N and m=1, 2, . . . , M;

determining third attribute values that comprise a third value of each attribute of the plurality of attributes for each user, by combining the first attribute values for each user with the second attribute values for each user;

processing the third attribute values, comprising determining from the third attribute values an identification of a subset of the N users to whom advertising of a product or service may be directed;

communicating the identification of the subset of the N users to a provider of the product or service;

wherein for a function F(V_(n,m,k)) of V_(nm,k) for n=1, 2, . . . N and m=1, 2, . . . , M and k=1, 2, said determining third attribute values V_(n,m,3) comprises computing V_(n,m,3) according to V_(n,m,3)=W_(m,1)*F(V_(n,m,1))+W_(m,2)*F(V_(n,m,2)) such that W_(m,k) is a weight that acts as a multiplier on F(V_(n,m,k)) for k=1, 2;

wherein said determining V_(n,m,k) for k=1, k=2, or k=3 comprises determining V_(n,m,k) for all user-attribute pairs (n,m) of user n and attribute m for n=1, 2, . . . N and m=1, 2, . . . , M except for a single user-attribute pair (n1,m1) such that n1 is 1, 2, . . . , or N and m1 is 1, 2, . . . , or M, followed by performing the steps of:

-   -   selecting attribute m2 of the M attributes subject to m2≠m1,         said selecting m2 comprising determining that V_(n,m1,k) is         linearly correlated with V_(n,m2,k) for a user class consisting         of N_(UC) users, wherein the N_(UC) users initially consist of         the N users minus user n1 such that N_(UC)=N−1;     -   after said selecting attribute m2, performing a linear         regression to determine a regression equation expressing         V_(n,m1,k) as a linear function of V_(n,m2,k) for the user         class; and     -   computing V_(n1,m1,1) via the regression equation.

The present invention provides a method and system that overcomes at least one of the disadvantages of the prior art.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a flow diagram of a method of tailoring advertising to suit a user, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram representation of an apparatus, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 3 is a table of attributes stored in a user's profile, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 4 is a table of mappings between keywords and user attributes, in accordance with a preferred embodiment.

FIG. 5 depicts a computer platform upon which the present invention may be practiced, in accordance with a preferred embodiment.

FIG. 6 illustrates a computer system 99 used for identifying users for advertising purposes, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 7 depicts a network diagram, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 8 is a flow chart describing how user data is obtained from Internet user usage of alternative web sites, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.

FIGS. 9-11 are tables depicting binary attribute values derived from Internet Service Provider (ISP) data, questionnaires, and a combination of the attribute values derived from the ISP data and the questionnaires, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 12 is a flow chart describing a method for identifying users to whom advertising pertaining to a product or service may be directed, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.

FIGS. 13-17 comprise tables illustrating the method of FIG. 12, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 18 is a flow chart of a method for identifying users for advertising purposes, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 19 depicts a table of attribute values in which in which an attribute value is missing, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 20 is a flow chart depicting a method for determining a missing attribute value, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 21 is a flow chart depicting the selection of attribute used to perform correlation and regression in the method of FIG. 20, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention method and system for identifying users for advertising purposes (i.e., for directing advertising content to such identified users), based on user interest profiles obtained through use of networked environments such as the Internet. A user's interest profile may be generated from user data obtained from a combination of different sources relating to the user's use of the Internet. A first source is the Internet user's network usage data as provided by an Internet Service Provider (ISP) who provides the user with access to the Internet. A second source is a questionnaire completed by the user regarding the user's interests in relation to alternative Internet usage for which the ISP does not provide pertinent user data. Such alternative Internet usage pertains to Internet mechanisms such as blogs, web forums, web newsgroups, web portals, etc.

The detailed description herein is divided into the following Sections:

1. Obtaining user data from Internet Service Providers;

2. Obtaining user data from questionnaires completed by users;

3. Combining usage data obtained from Internet Service Providers and from questionnaires;

4. Processing the combined usage data to identify users for advertising purposes; and

5. Method for determining users to whom advertising may be directed.

6. Processing Data With Missing Values

1. Obtaining User Data From Internet Service Providers

Acquiring a user's network usage information is performed by recording details about sites the user searches or has visited. More specifically, section headings and keywords off sites visited or searched can be recorded. This recorded information is allocated to one or more attribute record. The attributes are pre-defined. Typically, the attributes are selected from the group consisting of economic stratum, age group, sex, educational background, occupation, religious background, personal technical interests and personal special interests. Each instance of acquired data is weighted with reference to its allocated attributes, and from this the user profile can be generated. The weighting can be performed on the basis of time spent, or the frequency of visits to various sites. Their users profile can be continuously updated with subsequent usage (i.e., sessions).

The user profile can be specific to an individual person, and in that case requires the acquisition of identification data from the user. Such data can be acquired by one or more of the processes of acquiring a user s fingerprint, acquiring a user s retinal pattern or acquiring a user s voice pattern. Alternatively, the user s profile can be specific only to a demographic grouping, and the identification data is broadly characterizing. Such characterizing identification data can be obtained by capturing a video image of a portion of the user s body, including the head. Such video information is processed to extract information which includes one or more of sex and age.

The information provided to the user on the basis of his or her profile may include advertisements or other information.

FIG. 1 is a flow diagram of a method of tailoring advertising to suit a user, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention. A user session 10 begins with a user utilizing a computer to access the Internet. The user's fingerprints are captured in step 20. The fingerprints may be optionally acquired by a scanning device located in the computer keyboard or, alternatively, in the computer mouse. Such scanning may be undertaken using the photocell prism technique that is well known in the art and is disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,455,083 (issued to Paul B. Elmes, issued on Jun. 19, 1984). Other techniques and equipment for acquiring fingerprints, as would be apparent to one skilled in the art, may be used without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

The acquired fingerprints are passed to application software or a browser using an enhanced computer mouse or keyboard device driver. An attempt is made by the application software to match the acquired fingerprints with known sets of fingerprints in step 20. The known sets of fingerprints may be stored in a database. The database may be located on a server. A determination is made in step 30 as to whether the user is new or already known to the system. If the user is new, a unique identifier is assigned to the user in step 40. If the user is recognized as being known to the system, the user s existing identifier is retrieved in step 50, using the matched fingerprints from step 20.

As the user navigates the Internet and browses various sites, the content of each site visited is stored in a cache in step 60. Steps 60 and 70 obtain user site visitation data from the Internet Service Provider providing the user with access to the Internet. Storing each visited site in cache allows data to be extracted from each site in step 70, while the user session continues. Each site which a user visits is parsed; section headings and words in bold type are identified and stored as keywords in a database. The time spent at each site, and within sections of a site, is logged in step 80. An embodiment of the invention captures user data over time in an unobtrusive manner; information is not solicited from the user. The user may optionally provide fingerprint and user profile information. Where a fingerprint database containing user profiles and background exists, the advertising can be tailored more accurately to suit the user s profile. This is particularly the case when such a fingerprint database is, or can communicate with, a centralized database containing Social Security numbers or credit profiles. It is to be noted, however, that such extended functionality is subject to privacy laws applicable in the region.

Various session and profile attributes associated with a user are defined. These may include economic/social stratum, age group, sex, educational background, occupation/profession, religious background and special interests or hobbies.

Having accumulated data in steps 70 and 80 pertaining to the type of Internet sites visited and the length of time spent at each site, weights are assigned in step 90 to various session attributes. The weights are used as a determination of the user s level of interest in each session attribute and may be derived from time spent in particular sections in specific sites in a particular session. Thus, a high level of interest in a particular session attribute may result in a weight of 10 being assigned to that attribute, whereas an attribute in which the user has little or no interest may result in a weight of 1.

The identifier associated with the user in steps 40 and 50 is used to associate the user with a profile. Having assigned weights to various session attributes in step 90, the attributes in the user s profile are updated in step 100. By accumulating data over a number of sessions, the user s profile may become quite detailed and accurately identify the user s tastes and interests.

A determination is made in step 110 as to whether the user s profile matches a target profile for particular advertising to be displayed on the Internet site currently being visited by the user. If the user s profile does match the desired advertising profile, a tailored advertisement is presented to the user in step 120. As the advertisement directly appeals to the user s profile, including interest and budget, more sales typically result. If the user s profile does not match the advertising profile, a generic advertisement may be presented to the user in step 130.

Once a user has a profile stored in the system, all future connections to the Internet may be tailored in accordance with the user s known interests. Furthermore, future visits to Internet sites ensure that the user s profile is continually updated and refined so that the advertising directly targets the user s current interests and spending patterns.

It will be apparent to one skilled in the art that further embodiments may be practiced using retinal scans or voice recognition to uniquely identify the user. In the above example, an individual user s profile was constructed and updated by monitoring the user s internet usage.

FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram representation of an apparatus comprising a system 200, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention. The apparatus 200 may be comprised by the computer system 500 described infra in conjunction with FIG. 5, or alternatively by the computer system 99 described infra in conjunction with FIG. 6, for implementing the present invention. A user 210 interacts with a module 220, which in a preferred embodiment is an enhanced keyboard or computer mouse. The module 220 includes means for acquiring the user s fingerprints. Having acquired the user s fingerprints, the module 220 sends a query to a fingerprint database 280 to determine whether the user 210 is known to the system 200. The fingerprint database 280 interacts with a user profile database 285 via a duplex connection. The user profile database 285 stores session and profile attributes specific to identifiable users. The user profile database 285 provides information to an Ad database 270. The Ad database 270 uses the information from the user profile database 285 to customize advertising which is to be displayed on Internet web sites.

The module 220 also interacts with an Internet Application 230. The Internet Application 230 is used to navigate among different web sites on the Internet. The Internet Application 230 receives customized advertising from the Ad database 270.

Each site visited by the user 210 using the Internet Application 230 is stored in a data cache 240. The data cache 240 supplies the content from the web sites visited by the user 210 to a parser 250. The parser 250 identifies section headings and highlighted text as keywords. The parser 250 also monitors the time the user 210 spends at each web site visited. The parser 250 provides the keywords and timing information to the keyword and time information entity 260. The keyword and time information entity 260 provides information to the user profile database 285 to update the user s profile and session attributes.

In one embodiment, a trigger engine 290 may update users' session attributes stored in the user profile database 285. The trigger engine 290 can skew the weights associated with session attributes for all or individually identified users. The trigger engine 290 identifies universal trends across session attributes of many users. These universal trends could be influenced by local, national or international events pertaining to sport, politics, or weather. The trigger engine 290, on identifying universal trends, may optionally interact with an administrator 295 so that appropriate manual correction of user profiles may be made.

FIG. 3 is a table of attributes depicting a sample user profile derived over a period of five sessions, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention. The fields are only illustrative and should not be considered as a limitation. Furthermore, each attribute may optionally be associated with sub-attributes and profile and session values. The first column of the table shows seven profile traits: economic strata, age group, gender, educational background, technical interest, profession and special interests. These profile traits are divided into a number of attributes, which appear in the second column. For example, the economic strata profile trait is divided into attributes of very high, high, medium, low and very low. Similarly, special interests are divided into movies, music, sport, stamps, coins, paintings, travel and photography.

A weighting, described as the profile attribute value, is associated with each attribute and appears in the third column. The weightings are derived from the session attribute values, acquired over five sessions, which appear in the next five columns. In each session, a weight is assigned to each attribute relevant to the specific session.

Examining the profile trait “gender”, it is readily seen that the possible attributes are male and female. In each of the five sessions, relatively high weights were assigned to the attribute female. The attribute male was only assigned weights in two of the five sessions, and the weights assigned were relatively low. The weights are assigned based on the amount of time spent at sites which are classified as appealing to males or females, respectively. It appears very likely from the data that the user is a female.

In the first session, a weight of 9 was assigned to the attribute Movies, indicating that the user spent a significant amount of the user session looking at movie related web sites. No weight was assigned to the Attribute Movies for the second session, indicating that no relevant web site was visited. The third, fourth and fifth user session also recorded weights of 9 for Movies, indicating that the user has a strong interest in movies. The Profile Attribute Value stored in the user profile is, therefore, 9, indicating a high overall interest in movie-related web sites. The user visited a stamp-related site briefly in the first session and has not visited a stamp-related site in the succeeding sessions, so the Profile Attribute Value for Stamps is 1, indicating an overall low interest in that topic. Advertisers are able to use this information and customize the advertising presented to the user via the Internet. For example, the advertising banners on a search engine may display information about new release movies or videos and associated merchandising.

FIG. 4 is a table showing the mapping of keywords to user attributes for a sample user. in accordance with embodiments of the present invention. Keywords are extracted by a parser from web site content stored in a cache. In the first row of the table, the word Camera was identified as a keyword and the user spent 5 of 15 minutes on web sites or in sections of web sites containing the keyword. The keyword camera is mapped to the special interest attribute of photography and is assigned a weight of 6, based on the relative time spent by the user at sites containing the keyword camera.

The third keyword Maradona is mapped to the attributes Sport and Soccer. Appropriate weightings are then assigned based on the time spent visiting sites containing the keyword Maradona. As soccer is more specific than sport, it receives a slightly higher weight as a measure of the user s specific interest in soccer. Similarly, the keyword BMW is mapped to the attributes Cars and Economic Strata High and relevant weights assigned.

In the case where a user is identified only by a demographic grouping, then user characterizing data is acquired. This is done, in one embodiment, by capturing a video image of the user s body, including the head, from which demographic information can be discerned.

Techniques of facial recognition will be known to those skilled in the art, as will be the processes associated with discriminating an individual into one or more demographic groupings.

In embodiments in which individual users are categorized as belonging to a particular demographic, the Internet usage patterns of all users within the same demography contribute to the construction of that demographic profile, and thus to the style and content of advertising that will be presented to all members of the demographic.

The teaching given above relating to the acquisition of usage data, generation of a user profile, and updating thereof with continuing usage is equally applicable here.

Consider the following demographic groupings: Adult, Child, Male, Female, Adolescent, Student and Professional. Any single user will be grouped into at least two of these profiles. The manner in which advertisement URLs are mapped to each grouping is to (i) associate URLs which contain the group name as a part of the URL, (ii) associate URLs which are synonyms of the group name, or (iii) associate URLs which are already established in the electronic media or in authorized resources as being targeted to this demographic group (i.e. the URL.com may have an advertisement.).

The allocation of a user to particular demographic groups can also be weighted in accordance with the user s level of interest in specific sites, as discussed above.

An advantage of the invention is that owners and operators of Internet web sites are able to attract more sources of advertising based on the operator's ability to deliver dynamic target audiences. By consulting with companies wishing to advertise their goods and/or services, web site operators are able to assign a profile to each good or service being promoted. Goods and services may then be matched to a user s profile to ensure that a company with a range of products catering to different demographics is able to promote the product which best suits the user.

As many user profiles are generated over time, important statistical analyses can be performed using the acquired data. This may be used to further tailor the advertising content presented to different web sites.

FIG. 5 depicts a computer platform upon which the present invention may be practiced, in accordance with a preferred embodiment. The process for providing tailored information for a user via the Internet can be implemented using a computer program product in conjunction with a computer system 500 as shown in FIG. 5. In particular, the apparatus for acquiring a user s profile data (e.g., the apparatus 200 of FIG. 2 which may be comprised by the computer system 500), associating the acquired data with a user profile and providing information to the user based on the associated user profile can be implemented as software, or computer readable program code, executing on the computer system 500.

The computer system 500 includes a computer 550, a video display 510, and input devices 530, 532. In addition, the computer system 500 can have any of a number of other output devices including line printers, laser printers, plotters, and other reproduction devices connected to the computer 550. The computer system 500 can be connected to one or more other computers via a communication input/output (I/O) interface 564 using an appropriate communication channel 540 such as a modem communications path, an electronic network, or the like. The network may include a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), an Intranet, and/or the Internet 520.

The computer 550 includes the control module 566, a memory 570 that may include random access memory (RAM) and read-only memory (ROM), input/output (I/O) interfaces 564, 572, a video interface 560, and one or more storage devices generally represented by the storage device 562. The control module 566 is implemented using a central processing unit (CPU) that executes or runs a computer readable program code that performs a particular function or related set of functions.

The video interface 560 is connected to the video display 510 and provides video signals from the computer 550 for display on the video display 510. User input to operate the computer 550 can be provided by one or more of the input devices 530, 532 via the I/O interface 572. For example, a user of the computer 550 can use a keyboard as I/O interface 530 and/or a pointing device such as a mouse as I/O interface 532. The keyboard and the mouse provide input to the computer 550. In a first embodiment, the user s fingerprints may be acquired via a scanning device located in either one or both of the keyboard and the mouse. In a second embodiment, the user s voice pattern may be acquired via a sound card equipped with digital signal processing software located in the computer 550. In a third embodiment, the user s retina may be scanned by a scanning device connected to the computer 550. In a fourth embodiment, a video camera connected to the computer 550 may be used to capture a video image of the user.

The storage device 562 can consist of one or more of the following: a floppy disk, a hard disk drive, a magneto-optical disk drive, CD-ROM, magnetic tape or any other of a number of non-volatile storage devices well known to those skilled in the art. Each of the elements in the computer system 550 is typically connected to other devices via a bus 580 that in turn can consist of data, address, and control buses.

In particular, the software may be stored in a computer readable medium, including the storage device 562 or that is downloaded from a remote location via the interface 564 and communications channel 540 from the Internet 520 or another network location or site. The computer system 500 includes the computer readable medium having such software or program code recorded such that instructions of the software or the program code can be carried out. The use of the computer system 500 preferably affects advantageous apparatuses for constructing a runtime symbol table for a computer program in accordance with the embodiments of the invention.

The computer system 500 is provided for illustrative purposes and other configurations can be employed without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. The foregoing is merely an example of the types of computers or computer systems with which the embodiments of the invention may be practiced. Typically, the processes of the embodiments are resident as software or a computer readable program code recorded on a hard disk drive as the computer readable medium, and read and controlled using the control module 566. Intermediate storage of the program code and any data including entities, tickets, and the like may be accomplished using the memory 570, possibly in concert with the storage device 562.

In some instances, the program may be supplied to the user encoded on a CD-ROM or a floppy disk (both generally depicted by the storage device 562), or alternatively could be read by the user from the network via a modem device connected to the computer 550. Still further, the computer system 500 can load the software from other computer readable media. This may include magnetic tape, a ROM or integrated circuit, a magneto-optical disk, a radio or infra-red transmission channel between the computer and another device, a computer readable card such as a PCMCIA card, and the Internet 520 and Intranets including email transmissions and information recorded on Internet sites and the like. The foregoing are merely examples of relevant computer readable media. Other computer readable media may be practiced without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention.

The apparatus for acquiring user profile data and providing information to the user based on the associated user profile can be realized in a centralized fashion in one computer system 500, or in a distributed fashion where different elements are spread across several interconnected computer systems.

Computer program means or computer program in the present context mean any expression, in any language, code or notation, of a set of instructions intended to cause a system having an information processing capability to perform a particular function either directly or after either or both of the following: a) conversion to another language, code or notation or b) reproduction in a different material form.

FIG. 6 illustrates a computer system 99 used for identifying users for advertising purposes, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention. The computer system 99 of FIG. 6 represents an alternative to, or a modification of, the computer system 500 of FIG. 5. In FIG. 6, the computer system 99 comprises a processor 91, an input device 92 coupled to the processor 91, an output device 93 coupled to the processor 91, and memory devices 94 and 95 each coupled to the processor 91. The input device 92 may be, inter alia, a keyboard, a mouse, etc. The output device 93 may be, inter alia, a printer, a plotter, a computer screen, a magnetic tape, a removable hard disk, a floppy disk, etc. The memory devices 94 and 95 may be, inter alia, a hard disk, a floppy disk, a magnetic tape, an optical storage such as a compact disc (CD) or a digital video disc (DVD), a dynamic random access memory (DRAM), a read-only memory (ROM), etc. The memory device 95 includes a computer code 97 which is a computer program that comprises computer-executable instructions. The computer code 97 includes an algorithm for identifying users for advertising purposes. The processor 91 executes the computer code 97. The memory device 94 includes input data 96. The input data 96 includes input required by the computer code 97. The output device 93 displays output from the computer code 97. Either or both memory devices 94 and 95 (or one or more additional memory devices not shown in FIG. 6) may be used as a computer usable storage medium (or program storage device) having a computer readable program embodied therein and/or having other data stored therein, wherein the computer readable program comprises the computer code 97. Generally, a computer program product (or, alternatively, an article of manufacture) of the computer system 99 may comprise said computer usable storage medium (or said program storage device).

Thus the present invention discloses a process for supporting computer infrastructure, integrating, hosting, maintaining, and deploying computer-readable code into the computer system 99, wherein the code in combination with the computer system 99 is capable of performing a method for identifying users for advertising purposes.

Any of the components of the present invention could be created, integrated, hosted, maintained, deployed, managed, serviced, supported, etc. by a service provider who offers to facilitate identifying users for advertising purposes. Thus the present invention discloses a process for deploying or integrating computing infrastructure, comprising integrating computer-readable code into the computer system 99, wherein the code in combination with the computer system 99 is capable of performing a method for identifying users for advertising purposes.

In another embodiment, the invention provides a business method that performs the process steps of the invention on a subscription, advertising, and/or fee basis. That is, a service provider, such as a Solution Integrator, could offer to facilitate identifying users for advertising purposes. In this case, the service provider can create, integrate, host, maintain, deploy, manage, service, support, etc., a computer infrastructure that performs the process steps of the invention for one or more customers. In return, the service provider can receive payment from the customer(s) under a subscription and/or fee agreement and/or the service provider can receive payment from the sale of advertising content to one or more third parties.

While FIG. 6 shows the computer system 99 as a particular configuration of hardware and software, any configuration of hardware and software, as would be known to a person of ordinary skill in the art, may be utilized for the purposes stated supra in conjunction with the particular computer system 99 of FIG. 6. For example, the memory devices 94 and 95 may be portions of a single memory device rather than separate memory devices.

FIG. 7 depicts a network diagram, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention. The network diagram of FIG. 7 comprises the Internet 520 to which the web sites 225 are connected, an Internet Service Provider 505 which provides access for the users 210 to the Internet 520 and to the web sites 225, and the computer systems 500 (See FIG. 5) each comprising the apparatus 200 (see FIG. 2) where the apparatus 200 connects the users 210 to the Internet 520 via the Internet Service Provider 505, or alternatively the computer system 99 (see FIG. 6) in substitution for each computer system 500.

Although the user profiles generated from user data obtained from the Internet Service Provider may be beneficially used for advertising purposes as described supra, the user profiles may be enhanced by user data obtained from questionnaires completed by the user in relation to alternative Internet usage for which the ISP does not provide pertinent user data.

2. Obtaining User Data from Questionnaires Completed by Users

Alternative Internet usage comprises user participation in social networks pertaining to alternative web sites such as blogs, web forums, web newsgroups, web portals, etc. User participation in such social networks may be indicative of user interests and thus be helping to identify users for advertising purposes. Although these social networks are known to the users, the ISP may not provide pertinent user data relating to user participation in these social networks for various reasons. A first reason is that the ISP may be unable to provide pertinent user data relating to user participation in these social networks, due to privacy laws that preclude particular information from being accessed or distributed. A second reason is that the ISP may be unable to provide pertinent user data relating to user participation in these social networks due to the fact that some users may want to divulge information regarding their participation in social networks in a manner that such information is not directly accessible by the ISP. A third reason is that, since keywords are used to parse sites and sections of web sites as described supra, there may be an unacceptable level of uncertainty and associated inaccuracy of the user profile information derived from the user data.

Accordingly, attribute values are obtained from questionnaires completed by the users and the attribute values from the questionnaires are combined with the attribute values derived from user data supplied by the ISP (see Section 1) to arrive at a combined set of attribute values which may be processed to determine users to whom advertising may be beneficially directed. The list of attributes used for processing the data supplied by the ISP and for processing the data obtained from the alternative Internet usage at the alternative web sites is a predetermined list of attributes that has been identified.

FIG. 8 is a flow chart describing how user data is obtained from Internet user usage of alternative web sites, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention. The process of FIG. 8 comprises steps 301-304. The alternative web sites comprise web forums, web newsgroups, web portals, etc. The predetermined list of profile attributes has been established (prior to execution of steps 301-304) and is the same list of profile attributes (see FIG. 3) as was used in conjunction with the user data provided by the ISP as described supra in Section 1.

Step 301 parses the content of the alternative web sites to derive keywords. The parser 250, described supra in conjunction with FIG. 2, may be employed to parse the content of the alternative web sites and derive keywords using methodology similar to that explained supra. For example, the keywords may be derived from section headings and/or bolded text in the content of the alternative web sites.

Step 302 maps the keywords derived in step 301 to the list of attributes, which is analogous to the mapping depicted in FIG. 4 as described supra. However, values for the attributes shown in FIG. 4 are not yet known and will be generated in steps 303-304. For some attributes of the predetermined list of profile attributes, there will not be a mapped keyword resulting from step 302 pertaining to the alternative web sites. Similarly, for some attributes of the predetermined list of profile attributes, there will not be a mapped keyword from the mapping depicted in FIG. 4 pertaining to the web sites associated with the data supplied by the ISP. For both the alternative web sites and the web sites associated with the data supplied by the ISP, whether or not a given attribute of the predetermined list of profile attributes has a keyword mapped thereto depends on the content of the respective websites, since the content of each web site determines the keywords pertaining to each website.

Step 303 provides the users with questionnaires and requests the users to complete the questionnaires by indicating values for the profile attributes derived in step 302. For example, the users may be prompted to indicate a value in the range of 1 to 10 for each attribute to indicate the intensity of relevance of each attribute for each user, which is analogous to the attribute values shown in FIG. 4. In one embodiment, the questionnaire has a form of a table comprising the “Attribute” and “Session Attribute Value” column of Table 4, wherein the attributes are listed in the “Attribute” column and the user is prompted to fill in the attribute values in the “Session Attribute Value” column. Generally, the questionnaire may be structured in any format in which the user is requested to supply an attribute value for each attribute to which there is a mapped keyword from step 302.

For both the alternative web sites and the web sites associated with the data supplied by the ISP, the attributes to which there are no mapped keywords are assigned the minimum possible attribute value from the range of possible attribute values. In one embodiment, the minimum possible attribute value is 1 in conjunction with a range of possible attribute values of Ito 10.

Step 304 receives the completed questionnaires from the users, wherein the completed questionnaires comprise the attribute values indicated by the users.

3. Combining Usage Data Obtained From Internet Service Providers and From Questionnaires

After the methodology described supra in Sections 1 and 2 has been executed, there is a plurality of attributes and two sets of corresponding attribute values, namely a first set of attribute values derived from data provided by the ISP with respect to a first network of web sites (as described supra in Section 1) and a second set of attribute values derived from questionnaires completed by users with respect to a second network of web sites (i.e., blogs, web forums, web newsgroups, web portals, etc., as described supra in Section 2). The description next describes combining the first and second sets of attribute values to generate a third set of attribute values.

The first and second sets of attribute values may be the same values as determined by the methodology of Sections 1 and 2 (e.g., values analogous to the attribute values shown in FIG. 4). or alternatively may be further processed to another form.

In one embodiment, the attribute values may be converted to binary numbers (i.e., 0 or 1). For example, each attribute value not exceeding 5 is converted to 0, and each attribute value exceeding 5 is converted to 1.

Let U₁, U₂, U₃, . . . U_(N) represent N users;

Let a₁, a₂, a₃, . . . a_(M) represent M attributes of these N users.

Let S₁, S₂, S₃ denote the first, second, third sets of attribute values, respectively.

Let V_(n,m,k) represent the attribute value for attribute m of user n in set S_(k) (n=1, 2, . . . N; and m=1, 2, . . . , M; and k=1, 2, 3).

For illustration purposes, FIGS. 9-11 are tables depicting binary attribute values derived from ISP data, questionnaires, and a combination of the attribute values derived from the ISP data and the questionnaires, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention. FIGS. 9, 10, and 11 respectively depict the attribute values for the set S₁, S₂, S₃ represented as V_(n,m,k) for k=1, 2, 3, respectively, wherein V_(n,m,3) is computed according to V_(n,m,3)=V_(m,n,1) OR V_(n,m,2); i.e., V_(n,m,3) is computed as a logical OR between V_(n,m,1) and V_(n,m,2) for all combinations of m and n. In other words, FIG. 9 depicts attribute values of the first set S₁ as binary values derived from ISP data (see Section 1), FIG. 10 depicts attribute values of the second set S₂ as binary values derived from completed questionnaires (see Section 2), and FIG. 11 depicts a combination of the attribute values in FIGS. 9 and 10 as the logical OR between the binary attribute values pertaining to the first set (S₁) and the second set (S₂).

In one embodiment, the attribute values are real numbers or positive integers such as the attribute values in the table of FIG. 4, wherein V_(n,m,3) may be computed as a weighted sum of a function F(V_(n,m,1)) of V_(nm,1) and the function F(V_(n,m,2)) of V_(n,m,2), for n=1, 2, . . . N and m=1, 2, . . . , M, as indicated in Equation (1). V _(n,m,3) =W _(m,1) *F(V _(n,m,1))+W _(m,2) *F(V _(n,m,2))  (1) wherein W_(m,k) is a weight that acts as a multiplier on F(V_(n,m,k)) for k=1, 2. The weight W_(m,k) may be a function of attribute by varying with the index m. The weight W_(m,k) may be a function of network by varying with the index k (i.e., the weight W_(m,k) may differ for the first network and the second network for a given attribute m).

In one embodiment, W_(m,k) varies with both m and k.

In one embodiment, W_(m,k) varies with m but does not vary with k.

In one embodiment, W_(m,k) does not vary with m but varies with k.

In one embodiment, W_(m,k) is constant and does not vary with either m or k.

In one embodiment, F(V_(n,m,k)) is a linear function of V_(n,m,k) such that Equation (1) becomes: V _(n,m,3) =W _(m,1) *V _(n,m,1) +W _(m,2) *V _(n,m,2)  (2)

In Equation (2), the weights W_(m,1) and W_(m,2) may be normalized such that (W_(m,1))²+(W_(m,2))²=1.

In one embodiment, F(V_(n,m,k)) is a nonlinear function of V_(n,m,k). As an example, F(V_(n,m,k)) may have the form of F(V_(n,m,k))=(V_(n,m,k))^(P) wherein the power P is a positive real number subject to P≠1. For example, P may have such values as: 0<P<1, P=1/2, P>1, P=3/2, P=2, P=3, etc.

4. Processing the Combined Usage Data to Identify Users For Advertising Purposes

Section 3 has described supra combining the first and second sets of attribute values to generate a third set of attribute values. The first set of attribute values was derived from data provided by the ISP (or a plurality of ISPs) with respect to a first network of web sites (as described supra in Section 1. The second set of attribute values was derived from questionnaires completed by users with respect to a second network of web sites (i.e., blogs, web forums, web newsgroups, web portals, etc., as described supra in Section 2). The third set of attribute values is determined by combining the first and second sets of attribute values, as described supra in Section 3. This section describes processing the third set of attribute values to identify users for advertising purposes (i.e., for directing advertising content pertaining to a product or service to such identified users).

In practice, an advertiser of a product or service may specify a set of target attributes and associated target attribute values, to serve as a reference against which to compare the attribute values in the third set of attribute values, so as to identify users whose attribute values are closest, or sufficiently close, to the target attribute values.

FIG. 12 is a flow chart describing a method for identifying users to whom advertising pertaining to a product or service may be directed, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention. The method of FIG. 12, which comprises steps 311-313, utilizes the third set of attribute values pertaining to a plurality of uses to determine a subset of the plurality of users to whom the advertising may be directed.

Step 311 specifies a target profile of an ideal user of the product or service. The target profile comprises at least two target attributes and associated target attribute values, wherein the plurality of attributes comprises the target attributes.

Step 312 computes for each user: a nearness to the target profile of each user's third attribute values as a function of the difference between each target attribute value and the corresponding third attribute value of each user.

Step 313 applies nearness criteria to the computed a nearness of each user's third attributes to the target profile to determine a subset of the plurality of users consisting of all users that satisfy the nearness criteria.

FIGS. 13-17 depict tables illustrating the method of FIG. 12, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.

The table of FIG. 13 depicts 4 users (U₁, U₂, U₃, U₄) and a plurality of attributes consisting of 7 attributes (a₁, a₂, a₃, a₄, a₅, a₆, a₇). The 6 attributes of a₁, a₂, a₃, a₄, a₅, a₆ are the target attributes, and the associated target attribute values of “9” are shown in the “Target Profile” row to describe the target profile of an ideal user as specified in step 311. The U₁, U₂, U₃, U₄ rows indicate the third attribute values of the target attributes for each user. The third attribute values are derived from combining the first and second attribute values as described supra.

The table of FIG. 14 depicts, in the U₁, U₂, U₃, U₄ rows, the attribute value difference (ΔV) between the target attribute values and the corresponding third attribute value, as computed in step 312 from the target attribute values and the third attribute values in the table of FIG. 13. FIGS. 14-17 illustrate various techniques of the present invention for implementing step 313 to apply nearness criteria to the computed nearness of each user's third attributes to the target profile to determine the users that satisfy the nearness criteria.

FIG. 14 further depicts a threshold difference (TD) for each target attribute against which the attribute value difference (ΔV) may be compared. The TD row indicates a same threshold difference of 3 for each target attribute. The same or constant threshold difference may have any specified value (e.g., 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, etc.). However, the threshold difference may differ for different target attributes as illustrated in an alternative threshold difference (TD1) row in FIG. 14. The threshold difference TD1 is “1” for attributes a₁ and a₆, and is “2” for attributes a₂, a₃, a₄, and a₅.

In one embodiment, the nearness criteria for each user is that the difference (ΔV) between each target attribute value and the corresponding third attribute value of each user does not exceed the specified threshold difference (TD or TD1) of each target attribute (i.e., ΔV≦TD or TD1). If the TD row in FIG. 14 is used for the threshold differences, then the nearness criteria (ΔV≦TD for every attribute) is satisfied for users U₁ and U₄, but is not satisfied for users U₂ and U₃. If the TD1 row in FIG. 14 is used for the threshold differences, then the nearness criteria (ΔV≦TD1 for every attribute) is satisfied for user U₄, but is not satisfied for users U₁, U₂ and U₃.

In one embodiment for each user, each third attribute whose third attribute value does not differ from the corresponding target attribute value by more than the threshold difference is determined to be a strong attribute. Accordingly, the table of FIG. 15 depicts “S” to denote those third attributes which are determined to be strong attributes with respect to the TD1 threshold differences (i.e., the third attribute is a strong attribute if ΔV≦TD1). For example, the attribute a₃ for user U₂ is a strong attribute, because the associated third attribute value (ΔV) of 1 does not exceed the threshold difference (TD1) of 2.

In the preceding embodiment, a threshold ratio (R_(T)) is specified in conjunction with application of the nearness criteria. The nearness criteria for each user is that the ratio (R) of the number of strongly matched attributes to the total number of target attributes is not less than the specified threshold ratio (i.e., R≧R_(T)). Since the number of strong attributes is 4, 2, 3, 5 for users U₁, U₂, U₃, U₄, respectively, and the total number of target attributes 6, the ratio R is 0.67, 0.33, 0.50, 0.83 for users U₁, U₂, U₃, U₄, respectively. As an example if the specified threshold ratio R_(T) is 0.60, then the nearness criteria is satisfied for users U₁ and U₄, but is not satisfied for users U₂ and U₃. As another example if the specified threshold ratio R_(T) is 0.50, then the nearness criteria is satisfied for users U₁, U₃, and U₄, but is not satisfied for user U₂.

FIG. 16 depicts an example of one embodiment in which a first threshold difference (TD1) and a second threshold difference (TD2) are specified, such that TD2 exceeds TD1 for each threshold attribute. For each user, each third attribute whose third attribute value does not differ from the corresponding target attribute value by more than the first threshold difference is determined to be a strong attribute. For each user, each third attribute whose third attribute value does not differ from the corresponding target attribute value by more than the second threshold difference, but does differ from the corresponding target attribute value by more than the first threshold difference, is determined to be a medium attribute. For each user, each third attribute whose third attribute value differs from the corresponding target attribute value by more than the second threshold difference is determined to be a weak attribute. Accordingly, the table of FIG. 16 depicts “S” to denote a strong attribute, “M” to denote a medium attribute, and “W” to denote a weak attribute, using the preceding definitions of S, M, and W in conjunction with the values of TD1 and TD2 in FIG. 16.

For the preceding embodiment, the following parameters (in addition to TD1 and TD2) are specified: a threshold ratio (R_(T)); a strong weight (W_(S)); a medium weight (W_(M)); a weak weight (W_(W)); and a divisor (D) such that D exceeds the sum of W_(S), W_(M), and W_(W). In other embodiments, it is required that D exceeds the sum of W_(S), W_(M), and W_(W) by as specified amount A, wherein A is a positive real number (e.g., 0<A<1, A=1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 75, 100, 200, etc.). Let N_(S), N_(M), and N_(W) respectively denote the number of strong attributes, the number of medium attributes, and the number of weak attributes for each user. The nearness criteria for each user is that a ratio (R) is not less than the specified threshold ratio (i.e., R≧R_(T)), wherein R=C/D, and wherein C=W_(S)*N_(S)+W_(M)*N_(M)+W_(W)*N_(W).

As an example, assume that W_(S)=10, W_(M)=5, W_(W)=2, and D=30. Using FIG. 16 to determine N_(S), N_(M), and N_(W) for each user, FIG. 17 indicates values for the following parameters for each user: N_(S), N_(M), and N_(W); C; and R (for the case of D=30). For the indicated values of R in FIG. 17 and the specified threshold ratio (R_(T)), the nearness criteria can be applied for each user. As an example if R_(T)=1.00, then the nearness criteria is satisfied for users U₁, U₂, U₃, and U₄. As another example if R_(T)=1.75, then the nearness criteria is satisfied for user U₄, but is not satisfied for users U₁, U₂, and U₃.

In accordance with the present invention, the users not satisfying the nearness criteria are excluded from being comprised by the users to whom advertising of a product or service may be directed. Although the advertising of a product or service may be directed to the users satisfying the nearness criteria, some of the users satisfying the nearness criteria may also be excluded from the users to whom advertising of a product or service may directed by one or more constraints. For example, one or more constraints may limit the total number of users to which advertising of a product or service may be directed to a specified or determined maximum number (N_(MAX)) of such users, either as specified or as calculated as a specified percentage of the plurality of users. Let N_(SAT) denote the number of users satisfying the nearness criteria. Assuming that N_(SAT) exceeds N_(MAX), it is clear that N_(EXCL) users of the N_(SAT) users will be excluded from being comprised by the users to whom advertising of a product or service may be directed, wherein N_(EXCL)=N_(SAT)−N_(MAX), such as by utilization of one of the following techniques:

(1) randomly selecting N_(EXCL) users (of the N_(SAT) users) to be excluded;

(2) randomly selecting N_(MAX) users (of the N_(SAT) users) to not be so excluded;

(3) excluding the N_(EXCL) users (of the N_(SAT) users) having the lowest ratios R as defined in any of the preceding embodiments that utilize R;

(4) not excluding the N_(MAX) users (of the N_(SAT) users) having the highest ratios R as defined in any of the preceding embodiments that utilize R.

5. Method for Determining Users to Whom Advertising May be Directed

FIG. 18 is a flow chart of method for identifying users for advertising purposes, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention. The flow chart of FIG. 18 integrates and encapsulates the methodology described supra in Sections 1-4. The method of FIG. 18 comprises steps 321-329.

Step 321 identifies a plurality of users and a plurality of attributes.

Step 322 identifies a first network of first web sites of the Internet accessed by the plurality of users, said access to the first web sites provided to the plurality of users by a first at least one Internet Service Provider (ISP).

Step 323 receives, from the first at least one ISP, first data comprising content of the first web sites and time data pertaining to when each user of the plurality of users accessed the first web sites.

Step 324 analyzes the first data to determine first attribute values comprising a first value of each attribute of the plurality of attributes for each user, said first value being indicative of a level of interest in each attribute by each user, said analyzing based on an amount of time spent by each user at each website of the first web sites in relation to the content of each website of the first web sites.

Step 325 identifies a second network of second web sites of the Internet accessed by the plurality users, said access to the second web sites provided to the plurality of users by a second at least one ISP.

Step 326 derives, from questionnaires completed by the plurality of users, second attribute values comprising a second value of each attribute of the plurality of attributes for each user, said second value being indicative of a level of interest in each attribute by each user, attribute values of said second attribute values having been indicated on the questionnaire by the users of the plurality of users for each attribute to which a keyword relevant to the second web sites has been mapped.

Step 327 determines third attribute values that comprise a third value of each attribute of the plurality of attributes for each user, by combining the first attribute values for each user with the second attribute values for each user.

Step 328 processes the third attribute values, said processing comprising determining from the third attribute values an identification of a subset of the plurality of users to whom advertising of a product or service may be directed; and

Step 329 communicates the identification of the subset of the plurality of users to a provider of the product or service. Furthermore, the identification of the subset of the plurality of users may be stored in a computer usable storage medium of a computer system (see computer system 500 of FIG. 5 or computer system 99 of FIG. 6).

6. Processing Data With Missing Values

Section 3 described the attribute values V_(n,m,k) for attribute m of user n in set S_(k) of attribute values (n=1, 2, . . . , N, m=1, 2, . . . , M; k=1, 2, 3), wherein V_(n,m,3) may be computed as a function V_(n,m,1) and V_(n,m,2). N is the total number of users and M is the total number of attributes. In practice, one or more values of V_(n,m,k) (k=1, 2) may be missing or otherwise unavailable. The present invention provides methodology for determining a missing value of V_(n,m,k) from processing the known values of V_(n,m,k) (k=1 or k=2), or alternatively from processing those values of V_(n,m,3) which have been computed from the known values of V_(n,m,1) and V_(n,m,2).

Generally, the present invention provides methodology for determining a missing value V_(n1,m2,k) for k=1, k=2, or k=3 after V_(n,m,k) has been determined for all user-attribute pairs (n,m) of user n and attribute m for n=1, 2, . . . N and m=1, 2, . . . , M, except for a single user-attribute pair (n1,m1), wherein n1 is 1, 2, . . . , or N, and wherein m1 is 1, 2, . . . , or M. For example, if V_(5,4,1) is missing, then n1=5, m1=4, and k=1. For illustrative purposes, FIG. 19 depicts a table V_(n,m,k) in which V_(5,4,1) is missing, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention. In FIG. 19, N=8 and M=7.

FIG. 20 is a flow chart depicting a method for determining a missing attribute V_(n1,m2,k) for attribute m of user n, for k=1, k=2, or k=3, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention. Steps 401-403 of FIG. 20 determines V_(n,m,k) for k=1, k=2, or k=3 by determining V_(n,m,k) for all user-attribute pairs (n,m) of user n and attribute m for n=1, 2, . . . N and m=1, 2, . . . , M except for a single user-attribute pair (n1,m1) such that n1 is 1, 2, . . . , or N and m1 is 1, 2, . . . , or M

Step 401 selects attribute m2 of the M attributes subject to m2≠m1. Selecting m2 comprises determining that V_(n,m1,k) is linearly correlated with V_(n,m2,k) for a user class consisting of N_(UC) users. The N_(UC) users initially consist of the N users minus user n1 such that N_(UC)=N−1.

After step 401 selects the attribute m2, step 402 performs a linear regression to determine a regression equation expressing V_(n,m1,k) as a linear function of V_(n,m2,k) for the user class. The linear regression may be performed by any linear regression technique known in the art. For example, for a given set of N_(d) statistically scattered data points (X_(i),Y_(i)) (i=1, 2, . . . , N_(d)) representing data of variable Y versus variable X, a linear regression equation of Y versus X has the form of Y=b₀+b₁X, which may be obtained via a least-squares fit of a straight line through the N_(d) data points, wherein the coefficients b₁ and b₀ of the preceding linear regression equation are calculated as follows: X _(MEAN)=(ΣX _(i))/N _(d)  (3) Y _(MEAN)=(ΣY _(i))/N _(d)  (4) b ₁=[Σ(X _(i) −X _(MEAN))(Y _(i) −Y _(MEAN))]/[Σ(X _(i) −X _(MEAN))²  (5) b ₀ =Y _(MEAN) −b ₁ X _(MEAN)  (6) The summation Σ in Equations (3)-(6) is from i=1 to i=N_(d). In application of the preceding linear regression equation Y=b₀+b₁X to step 402, it is noted that X is V_(n,m2,k), Y is V_(n,m1,k), and N_(d) is N_(UC). The result of the linear regression in step 402 is a linear equation having the form of V_(n,m1,k.)=b₀+b₁V_(n,m2,k) for the user class consisting of the N_(UC) users, wherein b₁ and b₀ are calculated in accordance with Equations (3)-(6).

Step 403 computes V_(n1,m1,1) via the regression equation determined in step 402.

FIG. 21 is a flow chart depicting steps 411-416 for selecting the attribute m2 in step 401 of FIG. 20, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.

Step 411 calculates a Pearson correlation coefficient r(m1,m) between V_(n,m1,1) and V_(n,m,1) for the user class, for a limited range R of m=1, 2, . . . , M excluding m=m1. For example in FIG. 19, the limited range R is m=1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7 since M=7 and m1=4.

The correlation coefficient r(m1,m) is a measure of strength of the relationship between attribute m1 and each attribute m in the limited range r. The Pearson correlation coefficient r between variables x and y for n_(d) data points (x_(i), y_(i)) is:

$\begin{matrix} {r = \frac{{n_{d}{\sum{x_{i}y_{i}}}} - {\sum{x_{i}{\sum y_{i}}}}}{\left\lbrack {{n_{d}{\sum x_{i}^{2}}} - \left( {\sum x_{i}} \right)^{2}} \right\rbrack^{1/2}*\left\lbrack {{n_{d}{\sum y_{i}^{2}}} - \left( {\sum y_{i}^{2}} \right)} \right\rbrack^{1/2}}} & (7) \end{matrix}$ wherein the summation Σ in Equation (7) is from i=1 to i=n_(d).

Step 412 selects the attribute m2 such that the coefficient of determination r² (m1,m2) is maximal with respect to all r²(m1,m) in the limited range R. The coefficient of determination r²(m1,m2) between attribute m1 and attribute m2 accounts for the variability between attribute m1 and attribute m2 due to a linear regression between attribute m1 and attribute m2. For example, if r(m1,m2)=0.8, then r²(m1,m2)=0.64 and a linear regression between attribute m1 and attribute m2 accounts for 64% of the variability between attribute m1 and attribute m2, wherein 36% of the variability between attribute m1 and attribute m2 is due to other factors not considered in the correlation analysis.

The maximal range of r(m1,m2) is −1 to +1. Generally, r(m1,m2) may have a positive or negative value. In one embodiment, selection of the attribute m2 in step 412 of FIG. 21 (or in step 401 of FIG. 20) is limited to values of m2 such that r(m1,m2)>0. In one embodiment, selection of the attribute m2 in step 412 of FIG. 21 (or in step 401 of FIG. 20) is limited to values of m2 such that r(m1,m2)<0.

Step 413 ascertains whether a set of conditions are satisfied. The set of conditions are that |r(m1,m2)| is not less than a minimum level of correlation (r_(min)) and that |r(m1,m2)|/σ(m1,m2), denoted as t(m1,m2), exceeds a threshold level (t_(th)). σ(m1,m2) is a standard error of r(m1,m2) and is equal to [(1−r²(m1,m2))/(N_(UC)−2)]^(1/2).

If step 413 ascertains that the set of conditions are satisfied, then the method of FIG. 21 ends. If step 413 ascertains that the set of conditions are not satisfied, then: step 414 changes the user class; step 415 calculates r(m1,m) for the changed user class; and step 416 verifies that the set of conditions are satisfied. After step 416 is performed, the method of FIG. 21 ends.

In one embodiment, step 414 changes the user class by adding X new users to the user class, which increments N_(UG) by X, wherein X≧1. Adding X new users to the user class increases the sample size, which reduces statistical errors that may have contributed to the set of conditions not being satisfied in step 413.

In one embodiment, step 414 changes the user class by removing Y users from the user class which decrements N_(UG) by Y, wherein Y≧1 subject to N_(UG) being at least 3 after being decremented by Y. Removing Y users from the user class may comprise removing one or more outliners that may have contributed significantly to lowering the calculated correlation coefficient.

The Pearson correlation coefficient with the sample size of N_(UC) may be represented by at distribution with N_(UC)−2 degrees of freedom (i.e., N−3 degrees of freedom initially, since N_(UC)=N−1 initially). Thus in one embodiment, the threshold level t_(th) is a critical value (t_(crit)) of at distribution having N_(UC)−2 degrees of freedom at a specified significance level α, wherein t(m1,m2) exceeding t_(crit) rejects a null hypothesis of no linear correlation between attribute m1 and attribute m2. The critical value t_(crit) is a function of α and may be computed from knowledge of a using formulas known in the art and may also be found in standard t distribution tables of numerical values. As stated supra, t(m1,m2) denotes |r(m1,m2)|/σ(m1,m2).

In one embodiment, α is in a range of 0.05 to 0.10.

In one embodiment before r(m1,m) is calculated in step 401 of FIG. 21 for the limited range R, a first significance level α₁ and a second significance level α₂ are specified subject to α₂≠α₁, wherein selection of the attribute m2 is subject to a constraint of α=α₁ if r(m1,m2)>0 and α=α₂ if r(m1,m2)<0. For example, if a user considers positive correlation to be more valuable or reliable than negative correlation, then a lower value (i.e., a less stringent value) may be specified for α₁ (positive correlation) than for α₂ (negative correlation), such as α₁=0.10 and α₂=0.05.

In one embodiment, the threshold level t_(th) is a specified minimum value (t_(min)) of t(m1,m2).

The condition of |r(m1,m2)|≧r_(min) provides assurance that |r(m1,m2)| cannot be less than r_(min). In one embodiment, r_(min) is a specified constant value in a range of 0.70 to 0.85. In one embodiment, r_(min) is a specified constant value exceeding 0.85.

While embodiments of the present invention have been described herein for purposes of illustration, many modifications and changes will become apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the appended claims are intended to encompass all such modifications and changes as fall within the true spirit and scope of this invention. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for identifying users for advertising purposes, said method comprising: receiving, by a processor of a computer system, from at least one Internet Service Provider (ISP), first data comprising content of web sites of the Internet accessed by N users and time data pertaining to when each user of the N users accessed the web sites, said access to the web sites provided to the N users by the at least one ISP, wherein N≧4; said processor analyzing the first data, said analyzing comprising determining first attribute values comprising a first value of each attribute of M attributes for each user, wherein M≧2, wherein the first value of each attribute is indicative of a level of interest in each attribute by each user, said analyzing based on an amount of time spent by each user at each website of the first web sites in relation to the content of each website of the first web sites, wherein V_(n,m,1) denotes the determined first attribute value for attribute m of user n for n=1, 2, . . . , N and m=1, 2, . . . , M; said processor identifying a second network of second web sites of the Internet accessed by the plurality users, said access to the second web sites provided to the N users by a second at least one ISP; said processor determining, from questionnaires completed by the N users, second attribute values comprising a second value of each attribute of the plurality of attributes for each user, wherein the second value is indicative of a level of interest in each attribute by each user, wherein attribute values of the second attribute values have been indicated on the questionnaire by the users of the N users for each attribute to which a keyword relevant to the second web sites has been mapped, and wherein second data pertains to said access of the second web sites by the N users, and wherein V_(n,m,2) denotes the determined second attribute value for attribute m of user n for n=1, 2, . . . , N and m=1, 2, . . . , M; said processor determining third attribute values that comprise a third value of each attribute of the plurality of attributes for each user, by combining the first attribute values for each user with the second attribute values for each user, wherein the first, second, and third attribute values are binary numbers, or the first, second, and third attribute values are real numbers, or the first, second, and third attribute values are positive integers, wherein said determining V_(n,m,k) for k=1, k=2, or k=3 comprises determining V_(n,m,k) for all user-attribute pairs (n,m) of user n and attribute m for n=1, 2, . . . N and m=1, 2, . . . , M except for a single user-attribute pair (n1,m1) such that n1 is 1, 2, . . . , or N and m1 is 1, 2, . . . , or M, followed by performing the steps of: selecting attribute m2 of the M attributes subject to m2≠m1, said selecting m2 comprising determining that V_(n,m1,k) is linearly correlated with V_(n,m2,k) for a user class consisting of N_(UC) users, wherein the N_(UC) users initially consist of the N users minus user n1 such that N_(UC)=N−1; after said selecting attribute m2, performing a linear regression to determine a regression equation expressing V_(n,m1,k) as a linear function of V_(n,m2,k) for the user class; and computing V_(n1,m1,1) via the regression equation.
 2. The method of claim 1, said method further comprising: said processor processing the third attribute values, comprising determining from the third attribute values an identification of a subset of the N users to whom advertising of a product or service may be directed; and said processor communicating the identification of the subset of the N users to a provider of the product or service.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein for a function F(V_(n,m,k)) of V_(n,m,k) for n=1, 2, . . . N and m=1, 2, . . . , M and k=1, 2, said determining third attribute values V_(n,m,3) comprises computing V_(n,m,3) according to V_(n,m,3)=W_(m,1)*F(V_(n,m,1))+W_(m,2)*F(V_(n,m,2)) such that W_(m,k) is a weight that acts as a multiplier on F(V_(n,m,k)) for k=1,
 2. 4. The method of claim 1, wherein said selecting attribute m2 comprises: calculating a Pearson correlation coefficient r(m1,m) between V_(n,m1,1) and V_(n,m,1) for the user class, for a limited range R of m=1, 2, . . . , M excluding m=m1; after said calculating r(m1,m) for the limited range R, selecting attribute m2 such that r²(m1,m2) is maximal with respect to all r²(m1,m) in the limited range R; ascertaining whether a set of conditions are satisfied, wherein the set of conditions are that |r(m1,m2)| is not less than a minimum level of correlation (r_(min)) and that |r(m1,m2)|/σ(m1,m2) denoted as t(m1,m2) exceeds a threshold level (t_(th)), and wherein σ(m1,m2) is a standard error of r(m1,m2) and is equal to [(1−r²(m1,m2))/(N_(UC)−2)]^(1/2), wherein if said ascertaining ascertains that the set of conditions are not satisfied, then changing the user class and performing said calculating r(m1,m) for the changed user class followed by verifying that the set of conditions are satisfied.
 5. The method of claim 4, wherein said ascertaining ascertains that the set of conditions are not satisfied, and wherein said changing the user class comprises: (i) adding X new users to the user class which increments N_(UG) by X such that X≧1; or (ii) removing Y users from the user class which decrements N_(UG) by Y such that Y≧1 subject to N_(UG) being at least 3 after being decremented by Y.
 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the threshold level t_(th) is a critical value (t_(crit)) of at distribution having N_(UC)−2 degrees of freedom at a specified significance level α, and wherein t(m1,m2) exceeding t_(crit) rejects a null hypothesis of no linear correlation between attribute m1 and attribute m2.
 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the method further comprises prior to said calculating r(m1,m) for the limited range R, specifying a first significance level α_(i) and a second significance level α₂, such that α₂≠α₁; and wherein said selecting attribute m2 comprises imposing a constraint of α=α_(i) if r(m1,m2)>0 and α=α₂ if r(m1,m2)<0.
 8. A computer program product, comprising a computer readable hardware storage device having a computer readable program code embodied therein, said computer readable program code containing instructions that when executed by a processor of a computer system perform a method for identifying users for advertising purposes, said method comprising: said processor receiving from at least one Internet Service Provider (ISP), first data comprising content of web sites of the Internet accessed by N users and time data pertaining to when each user of the N users accessed the web sites, said access to the web sites provided to the N users by the at least one ISP, wherein N≧4; said processor analyzing the first data, said analyzing comprising determining first attribute values comprising a first value of each attribute of M attributes for each user, wherein M≧2, wherein the first value of each attribute is indicative of a level of interest in each attribute by each user, said analyzing based on an amount of time spent by each user at each website of the first web sites in relation to the content of each website of the first web sites, wherein V_(n,m,1) denotes the determined first attribute value for attribute m of user n for n=1, 2, . . . , N and m=1, 2, . . . , M; said processor identifying a second network of second web sites of the Internet accessed by the plurality users, said access to the second web sites provided to the N users by a second at least one ISP; said processor determining, from questionnaires completed by the N users, second attribute values comprising a second value of each attribute of the plurality of attributes for each user, wherein the second value is indicative of a level of interest in each attribute by each user, wherein attribute values of the second attribute values have been indicated on the questionnaire by the users of the N users for each attribute to which a keyword relevant to the second web sites has been mapped, and wherein second data pertains to said access of the second web sites by the N users, and wherein V_(n,m,2) denotes the determined second attribute value for attribute m of user n for n=1, 2, . . . , N and m=1, 2, . . . , M; said processor determining third attribute values that comprise a third value of each attribute of the plurality of attributes for each user, by combining the first attribute values for each user with the second attribute values for each user, wherein the first, second, and third attribute values are binary numbers, or the first, second, and third attribute values are real numbers, or the first, second, and third attribute values are positive integers, wherein said determining V_(n,m,k) for k=1, k=2, or k=3 comprises determining V_(n,m,k) for all user-attribute pairs (n,m) of user n and attribute m for n=1, 2, . . . N and m=1, 2, . . . , M except for a single user-attribute pair (n1,m1) such that n1 is 1, 2, . . . , or N and m1 is 1, 2, . . . , or M, followed by performing the steps of: selecting attribute m2 of the M attributes subject to m2≠m1, said selecting m2 comprising that V_(n,m1,k) is linearly correlated with V_(n,m2,k) for a user class consisting of N_(UC) users, wherein the N_(UC) users initially consist of the N users minus user n1 such that N_(UC)=N−1; after said selecting attribute m2, performing a linear regression to determine a regression equation expressing V_(n,m1,k) as a linear function of V_(n,m2,k) for the user class; and computing V_(n1,m1,1) via the regression equation.
 9. The computer program product of claim 8, said method further comprising: said processor processing the third attribute values, comprising determining from the third attribute values an identification of a subset of the N users to whom advertising of a product or service may be directed; and said processor communicating the identification of the subset of the N users to a provider of the product or service.
 10. The computer program product of claim 8, wherein for a function F(V_(n,m,k)) of V_(n,m,k) for n=1, 2, . . . N and m=1, 2, . . . , M and k=1, 2, said determining third attribute values V_(n,m,3) comprises computing V_(n,m,3) according to V_(n,m,3)=W_(m,1)*F(V_(n,m,1))+W_(m,2)*F(V_(n,m,2)) such that W_(m,k) is a weight that acts as a multiplier on F(V_(n,m,k)) for k=1,
 2. 11. A computer system comprising a processor, a memory coupled to the processor, and a computer readable storage device coupled to the processor, said storage device containing program code configured to be executed by the processor via the memory to implement a method for identifying users for advertising purposes, said method comprising: said processor receiving from at least one Internet Service Provider (ISP), first data comprising content of web sites of the Internet accessed by N users and time data pertaining to when each user of the N users accessed the web sites, said access to the web sites provided to the N users by the at least one ISP, wherein N≧4; said processor analyzing the first data, said analyzing comprising determining first attribute values comprising a first value of each attribute of M attributes for each user, wherein M≧2, wherein the first value of each attribute is indicative of a level of interest in each attribute by each user, said analyzing based on an amount of time spent by each user at each website of the first web sites in relation to the content of each website of the first web sites, wherein V_(n,m1,1) denotes the determined first attribute value for attribute m of user n for n=1, 2, . . . , N and m=1, 2, . . . , M; said processor identifying a second network of second web sites of the Internet accessed by the plurality users, said access to the second web sites provided to the N users by a second at least one ISP; said processor determining, from questionnaires completed by the N users, second attribute values comprising a second value of each attribute of the plurality of attributes for each user, wherein the second value is indicative of a level of interest in each attribute by each user, wherein attribute values of the second attribute values have been indicated on the questionnaire by the users of the N users for each attribute to which a keyword relevant to the second web sites has been mapped, and wherein second data pertains to said access of the second web sites by the N users, and wherein V_(n,m,2) denotes the determined second attribute value for attribute m of user n for n=1, 2, . . . , N and m=1, 2, . . . , M; said processor determining third attribute values that comprise a third value of each attribute of the plurality of attributes for each user, by combining the first attribute values for each user with the second attribute values for each user, wherein the first, second, and third attribute values are binary numbers, or the first, second, and third attribute values are real numbers, or the first, second, and third attribute values are positive integers, wherein said determining V_(n,m,k) for k=1, k=2, or k=3 comprises determining V_(n,m,k) for all user-attribute pairs (n,m) of user n and attribute m for n=1, 2, . . . N and m=1, 2, . . . , M except for a single user-attribute pair (n1,m1) such that n1 is 1, 2, . . . , or N and m1 is 1, 2, . . . , or M, followed by performing the steps of: selecting attribute m2 of the M attributes subject to m2≠m1, said selecting m2 comprising determining that V_(n,m1,k) is linearly correlated with V_(n,m2,k) for a user class consisting of N_(UC) users, wherein the N_(UC) users initially consist of the N users minus user n1 such that N_(UC)=N−1; after said selecting attribute m2, performing a linear regression to determine a regression equation expressing V_(n,m1,k) as a linear function of V_(n,m2,k) for the user class; and computing in V_(n1,m1,1) via the regression equation.
 12. The computer system of claim 11, said method further comprising: said processor processing the third attribute values, comprising determining from the third attribute values an identification of a subset of the N users to whom advertising of a product or service may be directed; and said processor communicating the identification of the subset of the N users to a provider of the product or service.
 13. The computer system of claim 11, wherein for a function F(V_(n,m,k)) of V_(n,m,k) for n=1, 2, . . . N and m=1, 2, . . . , M and k=1, 2, said determining third attribute values V_(n,m,3) comprises computing V_(n,m,3) according to V_(n,m,3)=W_(m,1)*F(V_(n,m,1)) W_(m,2)*F(V_(n,m,2)) such that W_(m,k) is a weight that acts as a multiplier on F(V_(n,m,k)) for k=1,
 2. 14. A process for supporting computer infrastructure, said process comprising providing at least one support service for at least one of creating, integrating, hosting, maintaining, and deploying computer-readable code in a computer system that comprises a processor and a computer readable storage device storing the code, wherein the code in combination with the computer system is configured to perform, via execution of the code by the processor, a method for identifying users for advertising purposes, said method comprising: receiving, by a processor of the computer system, from at least one Internet Service Provider (ISP), first data comprising content of web sites of the Internet accessed by N users and time data pertaining to when each user of the N users accessed the web sites, said access to the web sites provided to the N users by the at least one ISP, wherein N≧4; said processor analyzing the first data, said analyzing comprising determining first attribute values comprising a first value of each attribute of M attributes for each user, wherein M≧2, wherein the first value of each attribute is indicative of a level of interest in each attribute by each user, said analyzing based on an amount of time spent by each user at each website of the first web sites in relation to the content of each website of the first web sites, wherein V_(n,m,1) denotes the determined first attribute value for attribute m of user n for n=1, 2, . . . , N and m=1, 2, . . . , M; said processor identifying a second network of second web sites of the Internet accessed by the plurality users, said access to the second web sites provided to the N users by a second at least one ISP; said processor determining, from questionnaires completed by the N users, second attribute values comprising a second value of each attribute of the plurality of attributes for each user, wherein the second value is indicative of a level of interest in each attribute by each user, wherein attribute values of the second attribute values have been indicated on the questionnaire by the users of the N users for each attribute to which a keyword relevant to the second web sites has been mapped, and wherein second data pertains to said access of the second web sites by the N users, and wherein V_(n,m,2) denotes the determined second attribute value for attribute m of user n for n=1, 2, . . . , N and m=1, 2, . . . , M; said processor determining third attribute values that comprise a third value of each attribute of the plurality of attributes for each user, by combining the first attribute values for each user with the second attribute values for each user, wherein the first, second, and third attribute values are binary numbers, or the first, second, and third attribute values are real numbers, or the first, second, and third attribute values are positive integers, wherein said determining V_(n,m,k) for k=1, k=2, or k=3 comprises determining V_(n,m,k) for all user-attribute pairs (n,m) of user n and attribute m for n=1, 2, . . . N and m=1, 2, . . . , M except for a single user-attribute pair (n1,m1) such that n1 is 1, 2, . . . , or N and m1 is 1, 2, . . . , or M, followed by performing the steps of: selecting attribute m2 of the M attributes subject to m2≠m1, said selecting m2 comprising determining that V_(n,m1,k) is linearly correlated with V_(n,m2,k) for a user class consisting of N_(UC) users, wherein the N_(UC) users initially consist of the N users minus user n1 such that N_(UC)=N−1; after said selecting attribute m2, performing a linear regression to determine a regression equation expressing V_(n,m1,k) as a linear function of V_(n,m2,k) for the user class; and computing in V_(n1,m1,1) via the regression equation.
 15. The process of claim 14, said method further comprising: said processor processing the third attribute values, comprising determining from the third attribute values an identification of a subset of the N users to whom advertising of a product or service may be directed; and said processor communicating the identification of the subset of the N users to a provider of the product or service.
 16. The process of claim 14, wherein for a function F(V_(n,m,k)) of V_(n,m,k) for n=1, 2, . . . N and m=1, 2, . . . , M and k=1, 2, said determining third attribute values V_(n,m,3) comprises computing V_(n,m,3) according to V_(n,m,3)=W_(m,1)*F(V_(n,m,1))+W_(m,2)*F(V_(n,m,2)) such that W_(m,k) is a weight that acts as a multiplier on F(V_(n,m,k)) for k=1,
 2. 